HANK on Speed:

Robust Nonlinear Solutions using
Automatic Differentiation

Gregor Boehl
Uni Bonn

SED, June 2024

Motivation

Q: How to solve heterogeneous-agent GE models with many aggregate equations?

  • Reiter: linearize aggregates, solve linear state space system
  • SSJ: solve equilibrium as linear system in sequence space

Problem: What about strong nonlinearities (OBCs, assymetries, ...)?

This paper

Solve for nonlinear sequence space equilibrium:
  1. Fast: nonlinear transition dynamics within seconds
  2. General: applies to broad class of HA models
  3. Accessible: high level open-source implementation (like dynare): the Econpizza package


HOW:
new way to solve linear system of each Newton step

HANK

Detour: RANK

Most general representation of HA/RA models:
\begin{align} (a_t, w_t) &= E_t \: W(w_{t+1}, d_{t+1}, x_{t-1}, x_t, x_{t+1}) \\ d_t &= D(a_t, d_{t-1}) \\ \mathbf{0} & = E_t \: f(x_{t-1}, x_t, x_{t+1}, d_t, a_t) \end{align}
\begin{align} (a_t, w_t) &= E_t \: W(w_{t+1}, \cancel{d_{t+1}}, x_{t-1}, x_t, x_{t+1}) \\ d_t &= D(a_t, d_{t-1}) \\ \mathbf{0} & = \cancel{E_t} f(x_{t-1}, x_t, x_{t+1}, d_t, a_t) \end{align}
$$ \mathbf{0} = f(x_{t-1}, x_t, x_{t+1}, \cancel{d_t}, \cancel{a_t}) $$
  • $x_t$: aggregate variables
  • $w_t$: (marginal) values
  • $a_t$: agent's actions
  • $d_t$: distribution of agents

Detour: RANK

General representation of RANK models: $ \mathbf{0} = f(x_{t-1}, x_t, x_{t+1}) $

Solve by finding $\mathbf{x}=\{x_t\}_0^T = \{x_0, x_1, \dots, x_T\} \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times T}$ s.t.
$$ \small \begin{align} \mathbf{0} & = f(x_{0}, x_1, x_{2}) \\ \mathbf{0} & = f(x_{1}, x_2, x_{3}) \\ &\vdots \\ \mathbf{0} & = f(x_{T-1}, x_{T}, \bar{x}) \end{align} $$
$$ \small \begin{rcases} \mathbf{0} & = f(x_{0}, x_1, x_{2}) \\ \mathbf{0} & = f(x_{1}, x_2, x_{3}) \\ &\vdots \\ \mathbf{0} & = f(x_{T-1}, x_{T}, \bar{x}) \end{rcases} =F(\mathbf{x}) $$

Detour: RANK

Find $\mathbf{x}: F(\mathbf{x}) = \mathbf{0}$.

Newton's method:
$ \mathbf{x}_{i+1} = \mathbf{x}_i - J(\mathbf{x}_i)^{-1}F(\mathbf{x}_i) $
  • $J(\mathbf{x})$ easy to calculate ✓
  • $J(\mathbf{x})$ easy to invert ✓
$$ \tiny J(\mathbf{x}) = \begin{bmatrix} \partial f_1/\partial x_1 & \partial f_1/\partial x_2 & & & & \\ \partial f_2/\partial x_1 & \partial f_2/\partial x_2 & \partial f_2/\partial x_3 & & & \\ & \partial f_3/\partial x_2 & \partial f_3/\partial x_3 & \partial f_3/\partial x_4 & & & \\ & & \ddots & \ddots & \ddots & & \\ & & & \partial f_{T-2}/\partial x_{T-2} & \partial f_{T-2}/\partial x_{T-1} & \partial f_{T-2}/\partial x_T \\ & & & & \partial f_{T}/\partial x_{T-1} & \partial f_{T}/\partial x_{T} \\ \end{bmatrix} $$

Back to HANK

\begin{align} (a_t, w_t) &= W(w_{t+1}, x_{t-1}, x_t, x_{t+1}) \\ d_t &= D(a_t, d_{t-1}) \\ \mathbf{0} & = f(x_{t-1}, x_t, x_{t+1}, d_t, a_t) \end{align}
  • $J(\mathbf{x})$ hard to calculate ✗
  • $J(\mathbf{x})$ nasty to invert ✗
$F(\mathbf{x})$ still exists (Auclert et al., 2021):
  • given $w_T$: $\quad \mathbf{x} \underset{W}{\to} \mathbf{a}$
  • given $d_0$: $\quad \mathbf{a} \underset{D}{\to} \mathbf{d}$
  • $(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{d}, \mathbf{a}) \underset{f}{\to} \mathbf{z} \overset{!}{=} 0$
Newton's method: $ \mathbf{x}_{i+1} = \mathbf{x}_i - J(\mathbf{x}_i)^{-1}F(\mathbf{x}_i) $
$$ \tiny J(\mathbf{x}) = \begin{bmatrix} {\partial f_1/\partial x_1}^{\color{red}{*}} & {\partial f_1/\partial x_2}^{\color{red}{*}} & \color{red}\text{stuff} & \color{red}\text{spam} & \cdots & \color{red}\text{loot} \\ {\partial f_2/\partial x_1}^{\color{red}{*}} & {\partial f_2/\partial x_2}^{\color{red}{*}} & {\partial f_2/\partial x_3}^{\color{red}{*}} & \color{red}\text{junk} & & \color{red}\text{flotsam} \\ \color{red}\text{things} & {\partial f_3/\partial x_2}^{\color{red}{*}} & {\partial f_3/\partial x_3}^{\color{red}{*}} & {\partial f_3/\partial x_4}^{\color{red}{*}} & & \color{red}\text{trinket} \\ \vdots & & \ddots & \ddots & \ddots & \\ \color{red}\text{jigger} & \color{red}\text{debris} & \color{red}\text{trash} & {\partial f_{T-2}/\partial x_{T-2}}^{\color{red}{*}} & {\partial f_{T-2}/\partial x_{T-1}}^{\color{red}{*}} & {\partial f_{T-2}/\partial x_T}^{\color{red}{*}} \\ \color{red}\text{beer} & \color{red}\text{much} & \color{red}\text{more} & \color{red}\text{stuff} & {\partial f_{T}/\partial x_{T-1}}^{\color{red}{*}} & {\partial f_{T}/\partial x_{T}}^{\color{red}{*}} \\ \end{bmatrix} $$

Newton step for HANK

$$ \begin{align} \mathbf{x}_{i+1} &= \mathbf{x}_i - J(\mathbf{x}_i)^{-1}F(\mathbf{x}_i) \\ 0 &= J(\mathbf{x}_i) \mathbf{y} - F(\mathbf{x}_i) \qquad \qquad \text{with } \mathbf{y} = \mathbf{x}_{i} - \mathbf{x}_{i+1} \\ 0 &= \alpha \bar{J}^{-1}[F(\mathbf{x}_i) - J(\mathbf{x}_i) \mathbf{y}]\\ \mathbf{y} &= \mathbf{y} + \alpha \bar{J}^{-1}[F(\mathbf{x}_i) - J(\mathbf{x}_i) \mathbf{y}] \end{align} $$
  • but convergence?
  • requires all eigenvalues $\left|\lambda_k\left(I - \alpha\bar{J}^{-1} J(\mathbf{x}_i)\right)\right| < 1$
  • only works close to steady state with $\alpha <2$
As an iterative scheme: $$ \mathbf{y}_{j+1} = \mathbf{y}_j + \alpha \bar{J}^{-1}\left[F(\mathbf{x}_i) - J(\mathbf{x}_i) \mathbf{y}_j\right] $$
As an iterative scheme: $$ \mathbf{y}_{j+1} = \mathbf{y}_j + \alpha \bar{J}^{-1}\left[F(\mathbf{x}_i) - J(\mathbf{x}_i) \mathbf{y}_j\right] $$
but for (with $R(M, \mathbf{z}) = \frac{\mathbf{z}^\intercal M \mathbf{z}}{\mathbf{z}^\intercal \mathbf{z}}$): \begin{align} \mathbf{y}_{j+1} &= \mathbf{y}_j + \alpha_j \bar{J}^{-1}\left[F(\mathbf{x}_i) - J(\mathbf{x}_i)\mathbf{y}_j\right] \\ \alpha_{j} &= \min\left\{\alpha_{j-1}, \gamma\left|R\left(\bar{J}^{-1}J(\mathbf{x}_i), \mathbf{y}_j\right)\right|^{-1}\right\} \end{align}

Automatic Differentiation

  • AD: computational technique to efficiently compute derivatives
  • AD does not provide $J(\cdot)$ cheaply!
  • But: AD provides $J(\mathbf{x}_i) \mathbf{y} = \Lambda(\mathbf{x}_{i}, \mathbf{y})$ gratis
  • no need to calculate $J(\mathbf{x})$ ✓
  • no need to invert $J(\mathbf{x})$ ✓
Iterative scheme: \begin{align} \mathbf{y}_{j+1} &= \mathbf{y}_j + \alpha_j \bar{J}^{-1}\left[F(\mathbf{x}_i) - J(\mathbf{x}_i)\mathbf{y}_j\right] \\ \alpha_{j} &= \min\left\{\alpha_{j-1}, \gamma\left|R\left(\bar{J}^{-1}J(\mathbf{x}_i), \mathbf{y}_j\right)\right|^{-1}\right\} \end{align}
Final iterative scheme: \begin{align} \mathbf{y}_{j+1} &= \mathbf{y}_j + \alpha_j \bar{J}^{-1}(F(\mathbf{x}_i) - \Lambda(\mathbf{x}_i, \mathbf{y}_j)) \\ \alpha_{j} &= \min\left\{\alpha_{j-1}, \gamma\left|R\left(\bar{J}^{-1}\Lambda(\mathbf{x}_i, \mathbf{y}_j), \mathbf{y}_j\right)\right|^{-1}\right\} \end{align}

The Proposition


Given an initial guess $\mathbf{y}_0$, a scaling parameter $\gamma \in (1,2)$ and initializing $\alpha_0=1$, the iterative scheme \begin{align} \mathbf{y}_{j+1} &= \mathbf{y}_j + \alpha_j \bar{J}^{-1}(F(\mathbf{x}_i) - \Lambda(\mathbf{x}_i, \mathbf{y}_j)),\\ \alpha_{j} &= \min\left\{\alpha_{j-1}, \gamma/\left|R\left(\bar{J}^{-1}J(\mathbf{x}_i), \mathbf{y}_j\right)\right|\right\} \end{align} converges to \begin{equation} \lim_{j \to \infty} \mathbf{y}_{j} = J(\mathbf{x}_i)^{-1} F(\mathbf{x}_i) \end{equation} if all generalized eigenvalues of $\bar{J}$ and $J(\mathbf{x}_i)$ are real, positive and finite.

Speed!

T=200 T=300
first run again first run again
RANK 2.10s 0.09s 2.19s 0.18s
HANK1 10.97s 1.29s 16.55s 3.72s
HANK2 (small) 26.43s 2.13s 57.39s 10.70s
HANK2 28.38s 1.53s 80.56s 8.38s

Example: Model

2-Asset HANK + medium-scale DSGE

  • HANK:
    • cross sectional distribution of households
    • precautionary savings
    • portfolio choice
  • DSGE Features:
    capital, capital adjustment, capital utilization, sticky prices á la Rotemberg, etc...

Example: permanent increase in transfers

Example: permanent increase in transfers

Implementation

Thanks!

  • Solve nonlinear HANK models fast-as-light ✓
  • Econpizza: easy to use software package ✓